Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-07
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 03 April 2018 15:27 UTC
Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF8612DB6B; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 08:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJVNKDSpX67k; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 08:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (alum-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu [18.7.68.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D09127978; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 08:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074411-c85ff70000002b0e-1c-5ac39d41b4a2
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by alum-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 88.A3.11022.14D93CA5; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PaulKyzivatsMBP.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w33FQt0B001541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:56 -0400
To: "Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>, "draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology.all@ietf.org>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <3932ca75-95ae-64bc-be66-b189386c8d4a@alum.mit.edu> <9B4BC45FDEDDD84F813E9E4A5BAF8785A96B65D8@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <c307f8fe-4162-6e23-f61c-6292ec37cc1e@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 11:26:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9B4BC45FDEDDD84F813E9E4A5BAF8785A96B65D8@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprAKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixO6iqOs493CUwdfnohYLu2Usrr76zGJx +9MkFgdmj5Yjb1k9liz5yRTAFMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVMWNeF3PBF9GKxae8Gxj/C3YxcnJI CJhIXPr2l7mLkYtDSGAHk8TMzdeZIJwHTBJtS+YyglQJC8RIfN6/BSwhIrCXUWLVqs8sIAlm AX2Jv08WQ3V0M0p8uHCGGSTBJqAlMefQf7AiXgF7iSnHl4JNYhFQkZiz+iqYLSqQJnGpeSsz RI2gxMmZT8DqOQXCJBq6HrBDLDCTmLf5ITOELS5x68l8JghbXqJ562zmCYwCs5C0z0LSMgtJ yywkLQsYWVYxyiXmlObq5iZm5hSnJusWJyfm5aUW6Zrq5WaW6KWmlG5ihASz4A7GGSflDjEK cDAq8fAWuB6KEmJNLCuuzD3EKMnBpCTKy1d6OEqILyk/pTIjsTgjvqg0J7X4EKMEB7OSCO/c LKAcb0piZVVqUT5MSpqDRUmcl9lkb5SQQHpiSWp2ampBahFMVoaDQ0mC98VsoEbBotT01Iq0 zJwShDQTByfIcB6g4XtBaniLCxJzizPTIfKnGI05pjzv72HmOPF+Sg+zEEtefl6qlDivO0ip AEhpRmke3DRYQnrFKA70nDDvM5AqHmAyg5v3CmgVE9Aq+7wDIKtKEhFSUg2MsbNjeFvqo52u 6PczfZ75UszngF/6q/1qyhOevX653nR5jfAcDS/5WUW5G0KcJ/q8TJHIKTU6lz3Z8+rZOR3u C2VSL07ZXhGaEtRk++XSXB0jFS+nqd1Km681u0XzOh8yfViQpHRKR2by+5zttgdfPnzzf9K9 ChbNnVcYTqRfN234euXf5VeSSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAES11NyMDAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/T2V0rXWJuS-kx-KIv_Ut1u2UfqY>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 15:27:01 -0000
On 4/1/18 11:09 PM, Zhuangyan (Yan) wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thank you very much for your review and comments. > Some responses below. > > Best Regards, > > Yan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu] > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2018 1:20 AM > To: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology.all@ietf.org > Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org> > Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-07 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-07 > Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat > Review Date: 2018-03-31 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-03 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05 > > Summary: > > This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. > > Disclaimer: > > I conducted this review without any knowledge of YANG modeling. So the sort of review I can do is superficial. > > Issues: > > Major: 0 > Minor: 0 > Nits: 4 > > (1) NIT: > > In my opinion many of the normative references aren't actually normative, and can/should be changed to informative references. In particular the following all seem likely candidates: RFC5246 (TLS), > RFC6241 and RFC6242 (NETCONF), RFC8040 (RESTCONF), RFC8342 (NMDA), RFC8346. There may be others. > [Yan] For RFC5246 (TLS), RFC6241, RFC6242 (NETCONF), RFC8040 (RESTCONF) and RFC8342 (NMDA), they are building blocks for YANG module usage and definition, hence referenced as normative. I get your point, but as best I can tell there is no normative dependency on any of them. They are all *possible* substrates for using this work, but none of them are required. But it is your call. > (3) NIT: > > IdNits reports 3 errors and 7 warnings, regarding long lines, references that are missing, unused, obsolete, and a downref. Please fix the errors and review the warnings. > [Yan] I checked v-07 with idnits 2.15.01, there is no errors/warnings or nits found...can you direct me to the tool you use? I'm sorry. I actually reviewed -08, even though my message said I reviewed -07. I looked at the HTMLized version: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-08 and then cliced [Nits] at the top: https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-08.txt Thanks, Paul
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ie… Zhuangyan (Yan)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ie… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ie… Zhuangyan (Yan)