[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16

IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> Mon, 05 December 2016 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0330129AD2 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 07:26:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: "General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)" <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148095161971.3337.15318392735710804314.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 07:26:59 -0800
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/UMoqD_hsRePF8jp8-Cmzb6Xosh8>
Subject: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:27:00 -0000

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:  draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2016-11-22
IETF LC End Date: 2016–12-2
IESG Telechat date:  

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.


Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: