IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-02

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 10 September 2013 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8B521E8102 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 17:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YspQfSPG+5Z9 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 17:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A302F21E8063 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 17:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1VJC2N-0001YT-7C; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:42:35 +0000
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:42:33 +0900
Message-ID: <m2a9jlpkw6.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <522DEC24.4050501@bell-labs.com>
References: <522A3DBC.6090106@bell-labs.com> <011f01ceab4a$588d2de0$09a789a0$@ndzh.com> <522DEC24.4050501@bell-labs.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:42:56 -0000

>> I was comfortable with this in the document.  I believe authors need to be
>> comfortable with the document along with the WG.
>>
>> The authors appear to be more cautions than the WG or RIPE who endorsed the
>> document.
> 
> Great.  My intent was to bring attention to the sentence in the event
> that it had escaped unscathed.  Of course, from your response as well
> as the follow up from Randy Bush, it appears that adequate deliberations
> went into the thinking that allowed the sentence to appear.
> 
> Given all this, I am fine with moving ahead with the draft.

hey, thanks for the review.  so few do reviews.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email