[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-murchison-rfc8536bis-12

Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 08 April 2024 11:26 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-murchison-rfc8536bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171257561935.28618.11004675164506135033@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 04:26:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VqZyw7BUfCL2UcvUTpJ8gbA_PzQ>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-murchison-rfc8536bis-12

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-murchison-rfc8536bis-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2024-04-08
IETF LC End Date: 2024-04-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as a standard track rfc with a nit

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
In appendix B2 I noticed that the order of ut/local and standard/wall has
changed comparing to RFC8536 but did not see any mention of the change in
appendix D. Is this on purpose?

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-murchi… Roni Even via Datatracker
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-mu… Ken Murchison
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-mu… Ron Even