Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08

> On Mar 18, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Dan.  Thanks for the review, and I’m sorry you didn’t get a response to your question before.

Indeed, this document got moved to a later telechat and in the midst of that I failed to thank you for your reviews, Dan. I entered a Yes ballot. IANA had been tracking this for some time so I believe the instructions are clear. 

Alissa

> 
> Last part first: IANA does not normally make changes until the document is approved, and this is not an exception.
> 
> The changes to the derived property values are described in detail in the text in Section 3.  The designated expert will need to check all that and generate a list of specific chaanges to the table here:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.3.0/#idna-tables-properties <https://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.3.0/#idna-tables-properties>
> ...and IANA will then apply those changes.
> 
> Barry
> 
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:31 AM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
> 
> Document: draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 2019-03-18
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-05
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document is Ready. However, I have signaled one minor issue in my LC
> review which was not addressed in the revision, neither have I seen an answer
> to the clarification that I requested (unless I missed some mail).
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> (from my previous review, not addressed)
> 
> The IANA Considerations text is not clear to me.
> 
> > IANA is requested to update the IDNA Parameters registry of derived
>    property values, after the expert reviewer validates that the derived
>    property values are calculated correctly.
> 
> What does this exactly say? Are these recommendations for future actions, or do
> they refer specifically to property values described in this document? Are the
> expert reviewer validation and IDNA Parameters registry update required to be
> performed prior to approval of this document?
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art