IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 05 January 2018 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9E8127337; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 16:23:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IVu8a-8No0u8; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 16:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A7DC127011; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 16:23:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2082; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1515111807; x=1516321407; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Fo06vC7zC+7vM+JAb1zIRcW5G6tJG74u97Fos7I7HXg=; b=MR/lIs2y7eb+J9GLl2h9zRwpmdatBvGSg9YzRjdSUE+J91G53J6t8giW zcXrhgD1BVPJaL5p2DPlz4khomn6ssMzgaTPn46kUCD9OSFvQ8DNbpGll wfjqYyQdnQgMXEo99tJ58skZtneWljTy1QVQSog6QB9TgEndIlpjJhbQI s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DWAACzxE5a/4ENJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM+ZnQnB4QAiiSPCIIBlyqCFQojhRgCGoQaPxgBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUkBiMRRRACAQgOBgYCJgICAjAVEAIEAQ0Fii4QsSCCJ4o8AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWBD4MEghKDP4Mugy8BgW6DF4JlBYpvmGcCiASNNYIXhhiLVo0xiTICERkBgTsBHzmBT28VgmeEV3iHfYEWAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,316,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="51915102"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jan 2018 00:23:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w050NQUh013186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 00:23:26 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:23:25 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:23:25 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11
Thread-Index: AQHThbQ7LN6FZh339kek9y0uQG/Qz6Nka12A
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:23:25 +0000
Message-ID: <D6742D72.E86AC%acee@cisco.com>
References: <151510872060.14779.1209340587073567227@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151510872060.14779.1209340587073567227@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0EDE05AF8564684CAB93CF1185C36BF5@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ZfuJzHVNcXeiwR_-HESi_W2HpWY>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:23:29 -0000

Hi Joel, 

On 1/4/18, 6:32 PM, "Joel Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

>Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>Review result: Ready
>
>I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>like any other last call comments.
>
>For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
><https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
>Document: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11
>Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>Review Date: 2018-01-04
>IETF LC End Date: 2018-01-16
>IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-25
>
>Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
>
>Major issues:
>    N/A; my concerns from earlier versions have been addressed.
>
>Minor issues:
>    I understand the WG likes using the term "overload" for a link being
>taken
>    out of service.  I think people will learn what we mean.  I do wish
>we had
>    not chosen to misuse the words in this fashion.  This is much more a
>    graceful-link-close indication (or clsoe-pending indication) than it
>is an
>    overload indication.

I agree with this comment but I wasn’t sure we’d reach consensus on a
better alternative. However, after some though and consideration of
current OSPF router terminology, I’d propose we use the term
“Pending-Shutdown”. Does anyone not agree that this is a more appropriate
moniker for the TLV and state?

Thanks,
Acee 
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email