Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb-04

[Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for your review, Russ. Again!

Authors, any comments?

Jari

On 31 May 2016, at 21:54, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb-04
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2016-05-31
> IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-22
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary:  Almost Ready
> 
> 
> Major Concerns:
> 
> In Section 5.2, the document says:
> 
>   o  The Ethernet type is used to identify the frame as inter-FE LFB
>      type.  Ethertype 0xFEFE is to be used (XXX: Note to editor, likely
>      we wont get that value - update when available).
> 
> There is a process for getting an ethertype assigned.  It is handled by
> the IESG.  Please see: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/ethertypes.html
> 
> 
> Minor Concerns:
> 
> In Section 1.2: s/document reiterates the terminology defined/
>                 /document depends on the terminology defined/
> 
> In Section 2: s/The current ForCES model/The ForCES model/
> 
> 
> Nits:
> 
> Many places: s/IPV4/IPv4/
> 
> In Section 2: s/architecture calls out for/architecture calls for/
> 
> In Section 3.1, why are the paragraphs in bullets?  They see to work
> just fine as normal paragraphs.
> 
> In Section 5.2: s/header illustrated in Figure 6)/
>                 /header (illustrated in Figure 6)
> 
>