Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-geojson-03

[Tim Schaub <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the comments Meral.  I've proposed
https://github.com/geojson/draft-geojson/pull/208 to incorporate them.
Responses below ...

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Meral Shirazipour
<[e-mail]> wrote:

...

> -[Page 3], "any thing"--typo-->"anything"

I *think* the original text was meant to emphasize "thing", but it
ends up sounding awkward to me.  I think we should go with "anything"
if others agree.

> -[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?)

Done.

> -[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference
> RFC5139.

Done.  But see below ...

> -[Page 11], it says
>
> "Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location
>
>    uncertainty and confidence might treat ...
>
> "
>
> Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not
> treat..."? If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..."

I agree that this paragraph might add confusion.  I think the section
on Uncertainty and Confidence would be clearer if the whole paragraph
were removed.

> -[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case"

Good catch.  There were three of these.

> -[Page 12], "the OGC's "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84"
> [OGCURL]. "
>
> Should the URL  be moved to reference section?

Since http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84 is a URN, I don't
think it makes sense to include in the reference section.  It would be
nice if it resolved to something useful so it could serve as a
reference though.

> -[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have"

Changed.

> -[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics"

Also changed.

> -[Page 18], "can not be"---->"cannot be"

Done.

Tim

>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Meral
>
> ---
>
> Meral Shirazipour
>
> Ericsson Research
>
> www.ericsson.com