IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update-01

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 14 December 2015 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926821A017A for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:38:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HNOweee3Alx0 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827F41A0141 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:38:06 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2CWAwBBP8ZV/yYyC4dbGQSCMSEsIzFpBoUnpEcGBZMxCYFdHQEIhXoCgSY4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQlAQEDEhtMEgEVBw5WJgEEDg0aiAwBDKxsoD4BAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBAQEBGYYfigogDQQQgiUMQR2BFAWVCwGFAYkqRoNfgwuIWogqFw+BYIIdbwEBAYFFgQQBAQE
X-IPAS-Result: A2CWAwBBP8ZV/yYyC4dbGQSCMSEsIzFpBoUnpEcGBZMxCYFdHQEIhXoCgSY4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQlAQEDEhtMEgEVBw5WJgEEDg0aiAwBDKxsoD4BAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBAQEBGYYfigogDQQQgiUMQR2BFAWVCwGFAYkqRoNfgwuIWogqFw+BYIIdbwEBAYFFgQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,634,1432612800"; d="scan'208,217";a="133758890"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2015 08:38:03 -0500
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 14 Dec 2015 08:37:59 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:37:58 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Review of draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update-01
Thread-Index: AdE2dKQ+aOEfSVAWQD6DIpU5GjgXhA==
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:37:57 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC64BE@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.48]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC64BEAZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/cMsGcPbTbxu2yVZlT5IA_3tcCbo>
Cc: "draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:38:09 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.



For more information, please see the FAQ at



http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=BQMFAw&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=NMPxI88b49Rd87R2XmkgqLhVC4Bz2IhydB-0MwJ2T0s&s=LW6pxGWbYoxVERnO34-bGIf3JGqbGPADKYJ0QzhJ_Ms&e=>



Document: draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update-01

Reviewer:  Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 12/14/15

IETF LC End Date: 12/21/15

IESG Telechat date:



Summary: Almost Ready



A short, clear and useful document. There is however one issue that needs to be clarified and may need edits before the document is approved.



Major issues:



The goal of the document is to relax the registration policy of the NETCONF Capability URNs to allow for such allocations to be done via 'certain Experimental RFCs also, provided those specifications are carefully reviewed.' The proposed action is to change the registration policy to "IETF Review" 'which also allows registrations from certain well reviewed Experimental RFCs."



The problem is that the "IETF Review" policy is not restricted to Experimental RFCs which seems to be the motivation of the document. Informational RFCs can also be subject to IETF Review for example. The IANA Considerations section does either instruct IANA to consider only Standards Track and Experimental RFCs. I believe that this needs to be clarified in Section 2, and the registry be marked "IETF Review - see [RFC XXXX]" so that people asking for allocation be directed to the clarification of the policy.



Minor issues:



Nits/editorial comments:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email