IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update-01

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 14 December 2015 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599B61A1B25 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 06:31:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6vv_EecXPyNr for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 06:31:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466EF1A1B1F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 06:31:28 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2BQAwBBP8ZV/yYyC4dbGQEBAYJTLIE9BoMeplAGkzYJh30CHIEKOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBAQECARIREUUFBwQCAQgNBAQBAQMCBh0DAgICHxEUAQgIAQEEDgUIGod3AwoIAax4ilaQLw2FLAEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXgSKEfYUygk+CCTEHBoJjL4EUBZULAYp1AYM1hzCIWneHMxcPg31vAYFHgQQBAQE
X-IPAS-Result: A2BQAwBBP8ZV/yYyC4dbGQEBAYJTLIE9BoMeplAGkzYJh30CHIEKOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBAQECARIREUUFBwQCAQgNBAQBAQMCBh0DAgICHxEUAQgIAQEEDgUIGod3AwoIAax4ilaQLw2FLAEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXgSKEfYUygk+CCTEHBoJjL4EUBZULAYp1AYM1hzCIWneHMxcPg31vAYFHgQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,634,1432612800"; d="scan'208";a="133768562"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2015 09:31:26 -0500
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 14 Dec 2015 09:31:21 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:31:16 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Review of draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update-01
Thread-Index: AdE2dKQ+aOEfSVAWQD6DIpU5GjgXhP///KOA///u4/A=
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:31:14 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC6552@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC64BE@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <CALaySJ+gQYU5=qqza71HC+7r6LY5qJLLOViD4FWUSX4t85xq0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+gQYU5=qqza71HC+7r6LY5qJLLOViD4FWUSX4t85xq0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.48]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/u4xl-NXAhim6_idgZwGoesBoTZM>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:31:31 -0000

Hi Barry,

Thanks for the quick reply and for addressing my comment. 

> Should IETF consensus be to accept a registration
> from an Informational document, that's fine.
> Perhaps it's not likely, but that'd be up to the consensus of the IETF, which is
> the point here.

I am fine with this approach but this is not what the text of the 'motivational' part of the Internet-Draft says. Currently there is an a-synchronism between the text that explains what the I-D tries to do and the action it recommends. 

Regards,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: barryleiba@gmail.com [mailto:barryleiba@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Barry Leiba
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 4:26 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: General Area Review Team; draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-
> update.all@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-leiba-netmod-regpolicy-update-01
> 
> > The problem is that the “IETF Review” policy is not restricted to
> > Experimental RFCs which seems to be the motivation of the document.
> > Informational RFCs can also be subject to IETF Review for example. The
> > IANA Considerations section does either instruct IANA to consider only
> > Standards Track and Experimental RFCs. I believe that this needs to be
> > clarified in Section 2, and the registry be marked “IETF Review – see
> > [RFC XXXX]” so that people asking for allocation be directed to the
> clarification of the policy.
> 
> I believe that no clarification is needed.  There's no reason at all to put
> restrictions on registrations beyond what IETF consensus is at the time the
> registration is requested.  Should IETF consensus be to accept a registration
> from an Informational document, that's fine.
> Perhaps it's not likely, but that'd be up to the consensus of the IETF, which is
> the point here.
> 
> The non-normative text you cite describes what prompted us to do this.
> The normative text is the description of IETF Review in BCP 26.
> 
> Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email