[Gen-art] Gen-Art telechat review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256-04 (was Re: Gen-art (second) LC review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256)
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 01 September 2015 18:54 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686E41A1B2E; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_i0ZZlnMi2m; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E111A1BED; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t81IspKf070807 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:54:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <55E5F476.9080707@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:54:46 -0500
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-hansen-scram-sha256@ietf.org, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <551D8D6E.8010307@nostrum.com> <55C107C7.9020001@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <55C107C7.9020001@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/fSmSjptsHXwYt4UcoA2chdi22ak>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-Art telechat review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256-04 (was Re: Gen-art (second) LC review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:54:59 -0000
For completeness in the gen-art archives and so that Jari doesn't have to go looking: (boilerplate elided) Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard On 8/4/15 1:43 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > (apologies to the genart list who will see this as a duplicate): > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-hansen-scram-sha256 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 04-Aug-2015 > IETF LC End Date: 25-Aug-2015 > IESG Telechat date: not yet on any telechat > > Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard > > The change to PS addresses the concern I expressed in the review below. > miniscule-nit: I still think the extra URI section after the > references is not needed. > > RjS > > On 4/2/15 1:41 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >> you may receive. >> >> Document: draft-hansen-scram-sha256 >> Reviewer: Robert Sparks >> Review Date: 2Apr2015 >> IETF LC End Date: 24Apr2015 >> IESG Telechat date: (if known) >> >> Summary: Ready for publication as Informational, with nits that >> should be considered. >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> Nit: >> It raises flags for me when an Informational document uses "Updates" >> on a standards track document. >> I would argue that this does _not_ update 5802. IANA did the things >> that 5802 requested, and this document >> is requesting something else that happens to change those things. >> That makes this more of a "see also" than >> a "the protocol changed", and I think the Updates should be removed. >> >> I don't feel super strongly about the difference in _this particular >> case_, hence its classification as a Nit. >> But for consistency, and avoiding the issue of having an >> Informational update a PS, I hope you choose to remove it. >> >> Editorial comment: >> The URLs in the references section seem superfluous since you've >> already expanded them in the introduction? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> Gen-art@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >
- [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-hansen-scram-s… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-hansen-scr… Tony Hansen
- [Gen-art] Gen-art (second) LC review: draft-hanse… Robert Sparks
- [Gen-art] Gen-art (second) LC review: draft-hanse… Robert Sparks
- [Gen-art] Gen-Art telechat review: draft-hansen-s… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art telechat review: draft-hans… Jari Arkko