IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-lisp-mib-08

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Wed, 10 July 2013 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583A311E8135 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id byv5xFP-8eGK for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3A611E8141 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-b7fc36d0000032ea-9d-51dde4757038
Received: from EUSAAHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.78]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id B3.A3.13034.574EDD15; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:47:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [142.133.112.97] (147.117.188.135) by smtps-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.188.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.328.9; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:47:17 -0400
Message-ID: <51DDE3DA.7010003@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:44:42 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
References: <B86D52BC-5F5F-4B1F-8C10-9C59068CB8F5@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <B86D52BC-5F5F-4B1F-8C10-9C59068CB8F5@piuha.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [147.117.188.135]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXSPn27pk7uBBpcuyVvMXLCL0eLqq88s FjP2rWBzYPZYsuQnk8fWJdPZPL5c/swWwBzFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlbHm4Cz2gg+sFT9nf2Rv YNzJ0sXIwSEhYCIxc7ViFyMnkCkmceHeerYuRi4OIYGjjBIn1i5ngXB2MEqsWLyPBaSKV0Bb 4kLXRzYQm0VAVeLwvj4wmw1o0Iadn5lAbFGBMIkPy5YwQdQLSpyc+QSsVwSofu7RNawgQ5kF JjBK/Pz8AuwKYQF7iVW7TEFqhARsJPad+8gMYnMK2ErMfvSMHeI6SYktL9rBbGYBPYkpV1sY IWx5ie1v5zBD9GpKbF3znRXiMWWJHTMSJzAKz0JyxSwk3bOQdC9gZF7FyFFanFqWm25ksIkR GNbHJNh0dzDueWl5iFGag0VJnHeV3plAIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYzR/RXF +S9Sunn/Bp94u/FMdXfDxnnhMgY75iiVFc7hD7loyyIV+pgnxS/nxgn15NQdYvz/3M/lBRZz ah9zyZdc6Lr0nOXFzGchj7l3no/VccuL4/nE4hmgVBGj8TL7q/Ml6QOWHfbT10RoTpIzd8o9 MSPgx2vDV58DX03dLj31+cGJBi6e/5VYijMSDbWYi4oTAer1OCM5AgAA
Cc: "Miguel A. Garcia" <Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-mib@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-lisp-mib-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:47:24 -0000

Hi Jari,
  I went through the draft and it looks OK. I just had one minor issue
with some example math in the draft.

The following math in the Example 3 of lispMapCacheEntry is wrong and
needs to get fixed.

11 - (2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 4) = 1

I don't think that this should hold the draft up as it is only an
example, but it certainly did throw me off when I read it.

Thanks
Suresh

On 07/10/2013 05:23 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Miguel,
> 
> This draft is finally in IESG plate after you had reviewed it in January. Thank you for the review! I'm planning to ballot a No-Objection. I also noticed that for the IESG review it had been reassigned to Suresh. Suresh, any objections - have you reviewed this version?
> 
> Jari
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email