IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based-03.txt

Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com> Thu, 14 September 2006 08:39 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNmki-00012b-GV; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:39:20 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNmkh-00012V-EJ for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:39:19 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNmkg-0000uW-6f for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:39:19 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2006 04:39:18 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,162,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="102339748:sNHT32041048"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8E8dI94003456; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:39:18 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k8E8dHdM021165; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:39:17 -0400
Received: from [147.83.130.103] ([10.82.208.75]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:39:16 -0400
Message-ID: <45091532.8070201@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:39:14 +0200
From: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>
References: <4509128D.1050104@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <4509128D.1050104@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Sep 2006 08:39:16.0717 (UTC) FILETIME=[4382F9D0:01C6D7D9]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=1005; t=1158223158; x=1159087158; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=townsley@cisco.com; z=From:Mark=20Townsley=20<townsley@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20Gen-ART=20Review=20of=20draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based-03.txt |To:Harald=20Alvestrand=20<hta@google.com>; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dupx/Iw0QzmcbeKUnAayCKZZXiQw=3D; b=FDn1APBygLeSxUIxzZxVIxrcWDkqJTDJQUK3VC31/JzxpoUlIIrlJT5lDC40pGvKNxDsZkWm 83C2gLc3PLKoXVZWXmJWXPm3MWZ8kfMkK2CoDeSBDT3gYZt1zgBMBq5a;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=townsley@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc: jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be, Rick Wilder <rick.wilder@alcatel.com>, cliff.wang@us.army.mil, gen-art@ietf.org, olivier.paridaens@alcatel.be
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>
> But I am hard pressed to figure out why such documents belong even in 
> the vicinity of the IETF standards track.
> I'm happy to let these two documents out as Informational. I think any 
> such document belongs in that class.
They are being targeted for informational. And note the additional 
language I included in the IETF LC for these documents:

These documents were a product of first the PPVPN WG, and later the L3VPN
WG. They passed WG Last Call, but have not been actively discussed in the
WG for some time. There is little interest to work on CE-based VPN
problems within the WG today. The L3VPN WG is being rechartered to reflect
this, and these documents are being advanced as Informational for the
historical record.

- Mark
>
> But I suspect the political waters here are deep and troubled. I wish 
> the WG chairs and the ADs the best of luck in navigating them.
>
> No nits worth mentioning.
>
>                          Harald
>
>

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email