IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 16 May 2016 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797BD12D63E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2016 05:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.336
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.336 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cKbaOn0V0xel for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2016 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24BF312D600 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 05:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2BhAgBOwTlX/yYyC4ddgmwhKiIzfga5YgENgWwKFwEJhXACgSE4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RFAQMSGz4OEgEVBw5WJgEEDg0aiA0BDaMxmy4BAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBAQEfhiaJDR4eggoLQBiCLgWYJwGFfYoJToQBgx6FQ49BHgEBQoFMgiBuAQEBhkclGAF+AQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A2BhAgBOwTlX/yYyC4ddgmwhKiIzfga5YgENgWwKFwEJhXACgSE4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RFAQMSGz4OEgEVBw5WJgEEDg0aiA0BDaMxmy4BAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBAQEfhiaJDR4eggoLQBiCLgWYJwGFfYoJToQBgx6FQ49BHgEBQoFMgiBuAQEBhkclGAF+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,627,1454994000"; d="scan'208,217";a="187640578"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 16 May 2016 08:51:53 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 16 May 2016 08:51:53 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 16 May 2016 14:48:10 +0200
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc
Thread-Index: AdGvcBYpkDC+NeUERei4kcH4PtWbdA==
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 12:48:09 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751E3F78@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.48]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751E3F78AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/hyxxj8MI-tenHKd-wnn0zASfBck>
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 12:52:09 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.



For more information, please see the FAQ at



< https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=CwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=Z1Ci5uE-4lhATFG7ChwKJaQM5v75uVP9xIhq6-Yh7Os&s=fsaREMU4kl-9bvtGk1PwZgOFoAIbrkafiT3tUWZsu30&e=%20> >.


Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 5/16

IETF LC End Date: N/A

IESG Telechat date: 6/2



Summary:

The document is ready. It explains in a clear and detailed manner the operational experience in the design of large data centers using L3 only devices, Clos topology and BGP as routing protocol. I am not a routing expert, so I cannot validate all the statements made in the document, but the explanation seems clear and makes sense. The only comment I have is related to the lack of expansion of some of the acronyms (e.g. ASN, FIB ,etc.) - even if they are obvious for routing experts it would help to expand them at first occurrence.



Major issues:



Minor issues:



Nits/editorial comments:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email