IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Wed, 08 July 2015 01:45 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DF11B2CBD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xq-Hu_5GPDED for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08B71B2CBA for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.115]) by resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id pdkU1q0022VvR6D01dl8dr; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 01:45:08 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.151]) by resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id pdl71q00G3Ge9ey01dl7bE; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 01:45:08 +0000
Message-ID: <559C80A2.6090309@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 21:45:06 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
References: <20150703040329.26422.22765.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A478836EC@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <5599A773.40701@alum.mit.edu> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A478868AF@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <559BE75E.9010904@alum.mit.edu> <tslh9pgng78.fsf@mit.edu> <559C1633.10700@alum.mit.edu> <tsla8v7n7nt.fsf@mit.edu> <559C2B63.1060501@alum.mit.edu> <tslpp43las3.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslpp43las3.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1436319908; bh=whT/6j6Bd/q+rpj15cAeioWEa6JRk/VZf6QxzJ+WxBo=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=eXucon3cOIPaq6ksJc1yI/aKRCR+D1HzNfcorJFtr62ztIdlbAkEn0f7Lkzcjskts TisNiCZzkt2Qy9nc6ie8ZMSGnNiKdaILGDZN2fGpkGl85gHUBzmIxFKY3OfFV+6NAH JQjLsydsLSdoCZ884XxI7zNYvRty3i5RR9a9GaFV2Xo8aSOLpDvL8ZL8YV2Acao8+E m50VdT3UOyGcJ7VKFRYTSsg78vUbvqQbWV7HQjcnl4rdr7LGRpDCVne02WnTbHOXSV HJlldRhwiretYgo4SbEhHo10w6YldnI29baipxaOsn1S/E3V8TkgNKhht/a5uteG3J rh5jsU4kEZlbw==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/jcemTIOPK1Y3eXJvucmbWfZ5MK0>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-pcp-authentication.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pcp-authentication.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 01:45:11 -0000

On 7/7/15 9:04 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Yes.
> At this point I think you and I understand what we're talking about.
>
> I haven't been involved in this doc in a while.
> I think we need to let Tirumaleswar comment as well as get feedback from
> the rest of the group.

The main think I have been bringing to this is a fresh perspective, 
without any preconceptions about what the document is trying to say.

I agree it would benefit from further discussion among all the 
contributors to the document.

> Some of this may have been discussed in the WG while I was not watching,
> and you and I have been intentionally abstract.
>
> Unless you and I have both missed something obvious it seems unlikely
> we'll be done with this issue by the telechat.

Yeah. That seems likely.

> I am attending the Prague IETF and would be happy to spend significant
> cycles that week wordsmithing/discussing this issue with PCP folks if we
> don't clear before then.

I won't be in Prague. It seems I have become an emeritus participant. 
But I'll be available remotely. (Though early in the day Prague time 
would be tough for me.)

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email