Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Wed, 08 July 2015 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654241B2C66 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g3bGPuwrkQke for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3D191B2C65 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160BB20730; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 21:04:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cv9HzzwX-1vb; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 21:04:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-65-96-232-173.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [65.96.232.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 21:04:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id BE3AC88C32; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 21:04:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
References: <20150703040329.26422.22765.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A478836EC@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <5599A773.40701@alum.mit.edu> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A478868AF@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <559BE75E.9010904@alum.mit.edu> <tslh9pgng78.fsf@mit.edu> <559C1633.10700@alum.mit.edu> <tsla8v7n7nt.fsf@mit.edu> <559C2B63.1060501@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 21:04:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <559C2B63.1060501@alum.mit.edu> (Paul Kyzivat's message of "Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:41:23 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslpp43las3.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/pnQyQ2uUSyXLHb1VyvmSP-9O-Lg>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-pcp-authentication.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pcp-authentication.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 01:04:49 -0000

Yes.
At this point I think you and I understand what we're talking about.

I haven't been involved in this doc in a while.
I think we need to let Tirumaleswar comment as well as get feedback from
the rest of the group.
Some of this may have been discussed in the WG while I was not watching,
and you and I have been intentionally abstract.

Unless you and I have both missed something obvious it seems unlikely
we'll be done with this issue by the telechat.

I am attending the Prague IETF and would be happy to spend significant
cycles that week wordsmithing/discussing this issue with PCP folks if we
don't clear before then.