[Gen-art] draft-ietf-sip-eku-05.txt

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Mon, 08 June 2009 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CABF3A6AA2 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.042
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.042 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DOaZnc0vM735 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [91.121.26.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745753A6B9B for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n58DSB9X015117; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:28:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <200906081328.n58DSB9X015117@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:28:11 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: fluffy@cisco.com, scott.lawrence@nortel.com
Subject: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-sip-eku-05.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:28:15 -0000

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) 
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see 
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). 

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive. 

Document: draft-ietf-sip-eku-05.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 2009-06-02
IETF LC End Date: 2009-06-05
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 
(I apologize to have been late to send this review)
 - 1.2 page 3: X.680 [5],X.690 [6]. -> X.680 [5], X.690 [6].

 - 3 page 4:
   the application need not recognize -> needs???
   (BTW the spelling error, if it is an error, is in RFC 5280)

 - 9.1 page 7: IMHO (and shown by experience) numbering of references
  can lead to problems... I suggest to go to named references for next
  documents, in particular if they are longer.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

PS: I don't comment about the EKU idea, I've seen some PKI experts in
Acknowledgments so I expect you do the right thing.