Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-sip-eku-05.txt

[Francis Dupont <[e-mail]>]

 In your previous mail you wrote:
   >  - 3 page 4:
   >    the application need not recognize -> needs???
   >    (BTW the spelling error, if it is an error, is in RFC 5280)
   
   I believe that in this context, "need" is grammatically
   correct -- "needs not recognize..." does not seem to read very
   well.
   
=> there are in fact two questions:
 - is need the verb and the application the subject, in this case
  this seems to be a spelling error
 - in a quote should a spelling error be fixed? IMHO it should not.
So I put some '?' to mark I have no strong opinion about this.

   > PS: I don't comment about the EKU idea, I've seen some PKI experts in
   > Acknowledgments so I expect you do the right thing.
   
   Yes; the draft was socialized extensively with PKIX WG.  We
   even had a WG meeting slot to present the work and solicit
   face-to-face comments from PKIX during the formation of the
   work.  The LC in SIP also was CC'd to the PKIX WG and
   comments solicited from that as well.
   
=> I missed most of last PKIX WG meetings (I can't be at two places
at the same time :-) but I know who are the leaders in this WG
(and the mixed opinion about EKUs in the community). BTW it is
a typical LC item (it should be hard to find a more typical thing :-).

Thanks

[e-mail]