Re: [Gen-art] [Lwip] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04

Hi Roni,

Thanks for the clarification.

Yours,
Daniel

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:40 AM Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
> About the difference between the draft and RFC4303 when reading for the
> first time I thought that section 7 is not the same as 2.8 in RFC4303 about
> integrity only but it was my mistake. So forget this comment. Still you use
> authentication while RFC4303 use integrity but the recommendation is the
> same.
> Roni
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Migault [mailto:daniel.migault@ericsson.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2021 3:53 AM
> > To: Roni Even; gen-art@ietf.org
> > Cc: draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp.all@ietf.org; lwip@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04
> >
> > Hi Roni,
> >
> > Thanks for the review. We can of course add that RFC4303 is
> authoritative in
> > the main body. I will update the document.
> >
> > I am wondering what differences you have in mind. Of course the document
> are
> > different but I am wondering if there is anything we should clarify.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> > Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 3:58 AM
> > To: gen-art@ietf.org
> > Cc: draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp.all@ietf.org; lwip@ietf.org
> > Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04
> >
> > Reviewer: Roni Even
> > Review result: Ready with Issues
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review
> > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG
> for the
> > IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call
> comments.
> >
> > For more information, please see the FAQ at
> >
> > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >
> > Document: draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-??
> > Reviewer: Roni Even
> > Review Date: 2021-04-02
> > IETF LC End Date: None
> > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> >
> > Summary:
> > This is an early review of the draft. I find the 04 version easy to
> understand but
> > have one comment
> >
> > Major issues:
> >
> > Minor issues:
> > the last paragraph in the abstract , mostly the last sentence " RFC 4303
> remains
> > the authoritative description." should be in my opinion in the main body
> of the
> > document and not only in the abstract. I also see some difference
> between the
> > document and RFC4303
> >
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> Lwip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
>

-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson