Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 6:52 AM Jordi Palet Martínez
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi Meral,
>
>
>
> I just realized, if I understood correctly, that from GENART the review is completed, however, this has not been reflected at the document page:
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/
>
>
>
> Warren, I saw that it has been placed in the agenda of the next telechat, but opsdir review is also missing.

Yes, yes it is -- reviewers are volunteers, and often the review
arrives just before the telechat, and sometimes they don't arrive at
all.
Directorate reviews are mainly for the benefit of the AD - don't sweat
it if the review doesn't show up, it's not a blocker for the
document...
W

>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordi
>
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
>
>
> El 27/6/19 19:43, "Jordi Palet Martínez" <[e-mail]> escribió:
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot Meral!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordi
>
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
>
>
> El 27/6/19 18:43, "Meral Shirazipour" <[e-mail]> escribió:
>
>
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
>
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
>
>
> Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06
>
>
>
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
>
> Review Date: 2019-06-27
>
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-28
>
> IESG Telechat date: NA
>
>
>
>
>
> Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Informational RFC .
>
>
>
>
>
> Major issues:
>
>
>
> Minor issues:
>
>
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Meral
>
> ---
>
> Meral Shirazipour
>
> Ericsson Research
>
> www.ericsson.com
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf