IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avtext-client-to-mixer-audio-level-05.txt

Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> Mon, 26 September 2011 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jonathan@vidyo.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D0F11E80AA; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.149, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SpItThR4VpGl; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (mxout.myoutlookonline.com [64.95.72.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3E911E80A6; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448488BDEEA; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:55:47 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan
Received: from HUB013.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E591D8BDEE7; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:55:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from BE235.mail.lan ([10.110.32.235]) by HUB013.mail.lan ([10.110.17.13]) with mapi; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:55:43 -0400
From: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "draft-ietf-avtext-client-to-mixer-audio-level.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtext-client-to-mixer-audio-level.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:55:46 -0400
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avtext-client-to-mixer-audio-level-05.txt
Thread-Index: Acx7zFHMw8tY0yT3QTeZio8jG9V5dgAyJpDw
Message-ID: <C3759687E4991243A1A0BD44EAC823034C42868FB9@BE235.mail.lan>
References: <4E7FA0BE.1050201@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E7FA0BE.1050201@isode.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:54:44 -0700
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avtext-client-to-mixer-audio-level-05.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:53:04 -0000

Hi, Alexey -- thank you for the Gen-ART review.

Alexey Melnikov writes:
> Question: are the two encoding of the audio level indication option specified in the document really necessary?

Do you mean the one-byte vs. two-byte forms of the header extension (Figure 1 vs. Figure 2)?  These are the two forms of the generic header extensions defined by RFC 5285.  The actual payload (one byte containing the V and level bits) is identical in the two cases; the only difference is the container.  We can add some text clarifying this point if you think it would be helpful.

> Nits/editorial comments:
> s/relys/relies ???

Thanks, will fix.

-- 
Jonathan Lennox
jonathan@vidyo.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email