[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-09

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Tue, 13 March 2012 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0626521E806A; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.427, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5LdqRuNv6UBi; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB5D21E804F; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by werb10 with SMTP id b10so1107548wer.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=uGIDrycOtOSmXLa7iiHyBRPItkDPjilOUAWWbVb9Qgw=; b=0FxbbfTVGWD56GBiqNAbgKAyvVxc4l69HnEkLp2XTihDAzNJzEArxi8uo3uYZ9fR4q cWTf+iGKVG9VNySv33KeGGgmMYyx2QOYeqXQccVjvKPyuoWz6TbCj1SWfPPE54/9O5z6 C+m/inh+3O8meL+Aaw91d37d4mgap/LUlsizPjBO07tX5PAGtDrysiZTFCjwwRSy0cWd Od6RBF4XuWU+X6/yjhZBmuTgbdFAW6a7I5hX5xqwGW3CF8IwQXhdJedSGadOgwQ4gjmP zSdPdEQ71ziBaoUFXNrqlzBpoYe6JqGgWLiNPW2kIlK/Teovkq+sJA33B45BDQg5R9Oi IWNw==
Received: by 10.180.14.230 with SMTP id s6mr10304083wic.2.1331666768840; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from windows8d787f9 (bzq-79-179-219-130.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.219.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff9sm6892005wib.2.2012.03.13.12.26.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:25:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4f5f9f50.6965b40a.7aaa.6114@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_013B_01CD015F.C98A7E30"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac0BTwMc+gwlflbzSpuG4aNP5alsxA==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, 'IETF-Discussion list' <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:26:12 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

 

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

 

Document: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-09

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2012-3-13

IETF LC End Date: 2012-3-28

IESG Telechat date:

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC.

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues:

 

1.       In section 4.2  "In absence of both the MT-PRIORITY MAIL FROM
parameter  and the MT-Priority header field, other message header fields,
such  as Priority [RFC2156] and X-Priority, MAY be used for determining the
priority under this "Priority Message Handling" SMTP extension." .      My
understanding  from the third bullet in this section is that for this case
the message priority is "0" so I am not clear what this sentence means and
why is there a  difference if the MT-PRIORITY or MT-Priority values do exist
with regards to "Priority" and "X-Priority" for this case.

2.       In section 8 "MT-PRIORITY=3". I did not see where the MT-PRIORITY
SMTP  extension is specified and has the syntax of using "=" before the
value.

 

 

Nits/editorial comments:

 

1.       MUA is used in section 1 but expanded only in section 5. 

2.       Some typos in section 5. "syntatically - syntactically" "prioritiy
- priority" "comminicate - communicate" "contraints -constraints"

3.       In section 10 for X.3.TBD3 "Description:  The message mas accepted"
I assume you meant "was"

4.       In section D.2 first paragraph some typos "focusses -focuses"
"comparision - comparison"