[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-avpf-ccm-09.txt

Magnus: Thanks for the attention to the review.  More inline.

Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>>  I am curious: I don't believe that SIP re-INVs are used to affect
>>  the sort of codec control messages being discussed in this draft.
>>  I believe that you are pointing out that folks should not use
>>  other means -- like SIP re-INVs -- for this purpose in the
>>  *future.*  If so, I would suggest the following change:
>>   s/undesirable when used/undesirable if used/
> 
> Yes, and actually we probably should rephrase this to correctly cover
> SIP INFO and the usage like
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mmusic/draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control-11.txt

Right; the latter is probably more directly applicable to the
sort of media control messages discussed in your draft.  The
utility of SIP INFO has been debated many times in the SIP WG
mailing list -- and in fact, one such debate is brewing mightily
even as we speak -- so I'd be surprised if SIP INFO was used
in the context of your draft.  But it could happen; so pointing
it out to implementors not to use the signaling messages is still
a good idea.

Oh, and I noticed one more small nit:

S3.1: s/Basso, et al/Basso et. al/

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW:   http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art