Re: [Gendispatch] Sponsored or Endorsed by the Internet Society in draft-eggert-bcp45bis

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 30 September 2021 01:13 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD8E3A0C81 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HmAPBkVcc3BU for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DACD3A0C82 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id y1so2788372plk.10 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=68ai3/pNc9NqazTRWlvtkKrZVmOU5UQojikzeibrWSo=; b=ZEgKQgrRYHk8GYRyeMdhtl5k+U82GOr/wRU6PBWi3Ki5V4z4y6S43qSMxHhX+nScIf lp0qejyeggHDgnjUiSIc4IHCe4eU7Ueg6udoBgU2nrkAMiN5Dad/0Goh19h9yz2Fh5al fqzfux8Ll69YEwKpwqlJGF8WRnNc1glRtC9qCe2U7qhrkJx1vil+TvHobDzoYLYNZVUH tbbLFzrBhrnj1PMIb2QZ9fvKRO54Fp0GoQfMxjvrrX1VTNfz46pybSJPxk6JOOi/TMCl 75Fc/jjSIFg0odITkKTx5dwrqD4KUiQtZ1hoIu6yKxWbEYVyx1iATYHdVgCFE2dVXwM5 9tEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=68ai3/pNc9NqazTRWlvtkKrZVmOU5UQojikzeibrWSo=; b=vbCZciy+Eu/Z/vSIriNigYo2ydYuTfNd3hsEaBrHYmEtQzhQxFcMveyshjThn9rfY1 SnTElFfq/n7kjrCwK4/jeRvRrg2SuCUlMvdolk68lZoVIpvISPotppQ2g3EbEugI/Zxb JLUJZXA30Qw11mxRW7kXxsTKsSX+e3npBGdShEUD7tP6QKLPuhwI7ExrTMwl3fwMpHPo 2Ny7jAp9Tge9CHmvIBEhxUqYiX+k4XSICAQ1er4NIFl+Pe854wONW1Q5JIruneysZTI3 9RxQ8M/YUkcFaDR3jDXcRh3UsRheVbV3xVY0FboAljr3nKw9JDKHeu1gulLiNtL/PGJL A/NA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533nnhCwbQIL91TWjXV57XdSeUsG8N4SY2xn0DOQJjpIYNH0QHm6 5GEGn6Kvh8N68pe+s1mik9Zpyz6Ek+OrNg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzejgl9AfFYKlPujRWIO+vTrkgmXOqx+8hhsgcKlrXwQ/OOfdl/haSLAW2cfG1hl3bbmf1P8A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4a04:: with SMTP id e4mr3186385pjh.51.1632964417273; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i8sm865439pfo.117.2021.09.29.18.13.35 for <gendispatch@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: gendispatch@ietf.org
References: <CAB75xn7K5Woecs=iB38a_v8o2D1FdbLs2iVL2rnHOtb_9raXHg@mail.gmail.com> <69A80D31-D09A-4529-BD2E-C6DE5C24A1E6@ietf.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <73de8e6c-6c07-ac14-819c-b4c663275b51@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:13:32 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <69A80D31-D09A-4529-BD2E-C6DE5C24A1E6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/6I8crMbJXTti_jXV3m9F03TvsN8>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Sponsored or Endorsed by the Internet Society in draft-eggert-bcp45bis
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:13:43 -0000

On 30-Sep-21 13:53, Jay Daley wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 29/09/2021, at 11:56 PM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Both RFC3005 and draft-eggert-bcp45bis have text on conferences/ events/activities that are sponsored or endorsed by the Internet Society or IETF. The SAA team is looking for suggestions if it is okay to remove Internet Society; as it is difficult to judge if something is ISOC sponsored/endorsed [1]. Thoughts?
> 
> An alternative is to qualify who can send them, such that:
> 
>> Announcements of conferences, events, or activities that are sponsored or endorsed by the Internet Society or IETF.
> 
> becomes two bullets:
> 
>> Announcements from Internet Society employees or board members, regarding conferences, events, or activities that are sponsored or endorsed by the Internet Society
>> Announcements from the IESG, IAB, IETF LLC, IETF Trust and IETF Secretariat, regarding conferences, events, or activities that are sponsored or endorsed by the IETF.

That goes too far. People legitimately announce side meetings, sometimes even design team meetings, that are of interest to the community but are not formally "sponsored or endorsed". These days, such meetings are no longer limited to the "side" of a face to face meeting, so could come any time, and ietf@ is really the only list we have for that. In any case, the SAAs already have discretion if someone oversteps.

Take this legislation too far and the only option will be alt.ietf (for all I know, that already exists).

   Brian

 

> 
> 
> Jay
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dhruv    
>>
>> [1] https://www.internetsociety.org/events/
>>
>> PR -> https://github.com/larseggert/bcp45bis/pull/9
>> -- 
>> Gendispatch mailing list
>> Gendispatch@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch
>