Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?

[John C Klensin <[e-mail]>]

Adam,

Do you plan for the new version of draft-roach-bis-documents to
reflect the IESG's (presumably pending) response to my recent
appeal?  I ask because the interactions between the two might
lead to a lively discussion and hence require somewhat more time
than a simple presentation of a new iteration on the document
would require.

best,
  john


--On Thursday, February 27, 2020 12:04 -0600 Pete Resnick
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> I forgot to ask you Adam: How much time did you want on the
> agenda?
> 
> pr
> 
> On 18 Jan 2020, at 16:18, Adam Roach wrote:
> 
>> On 1/15/20 22:34, Pete Resnick wrote:
>>> As the time quickly approaches for requesting a meeting for
>>> the March  IETF, your gendispatch chairs wonder if there are
>>> agenda items for  which we should schedule a meeting. Please
>>> let us know on the  gendispatch list (the Reply-To on this
>>> message is set there) within  the next two weeks if you have
>>> any potential agenda items so we can  decide if a meeting is
>>> necessary.
>> 
>> 
>> GENDISPATCH chairs --
>> 
>> I'm planning to spin a new version of
>> draft-roach-bis-documents in the  next few weeks, based on
>> the feedback that has been provided so far. I  think this
>> would be a candidate for discussion in GENDISPATCH.
>> 
>> /a