IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-02.txt

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Tue, 07 December 2021 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860953A09F3 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:23:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.615
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.615 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWuyog5MpVhb for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B400F3A0815 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J7kbT2TDzz1pKqr; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1638890629; bh=84/v2T1JTyL8I2vV7UcizTsdbIFKsLKI4w4WIQH7tNg=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=qzKTa8Do3WvaAAtbBzKEXeDnKaa7nm41Xl2RYEez3yN/He3x+yawEIFas7POA/b/M S65Cm2PdEsX84VYMOcphveQF+PsfTx8hkIIpfV5rHxRbQAPyHcoBXzTeYU05HfduyU OqIzT9WoBwUQOSUkNj04pSS37D16Lpcs9TMw0v8g=
X-Quarantine-ID: <oWPShSRebeAV>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.22.111] (50-233-136-230-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4J7kbS5PjRz1pKqP; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:23:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <6cdf82b3-a0b2-bc43-5a96-668c95efd977@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 10:23:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
References: <163888571249.24497.10936065060790920242@ietfa.amsl.com> <e741f8a4-67f2-e350-47bc-f20f3f6bdac7@joelhalpern.com> <EEDF5039-5895-49C4-A518-FB31675759C7@akamai.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <EEDF5039-5895-49C4-A518-FB31675759C7@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/TkWEAqoOc0lhJ77F_aQkj2OOfNc>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-02.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 15:23:54 -0000

Thanks Rich.

On the choices of channel, I have not checked with my co-authors.  As 
far as I know, it is up to the person looking to make the report.  And 
probably varies based on the circumstances as to which would be "best" 
if it were possible to tell.

Yours,
Joel

On 12/7/2021 9:48 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I like this version, thanks to you and the authors for the revisions.
> 
> I have a question, which shouldn't affect the dispatch of the document.  In section 6, are those channels in a particular order, or is it "pick any (one or more?) of these" or something else?
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email