[Geopriv] PIDF-LO and the presence data model
Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Thu, 14 July 2005 02:23 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DstNm-0007ZH-5G; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:23:26 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DstNk-0007Z6-62; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:23:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA02998; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:23:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu ([128.59.29.6] ident=cu41754) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DstqF-0002tc-Ui; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:52:53 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.31] (pool-141-153-198-113.mad.east.verizon.net [141.153.198.113]) (user=hgs10 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6E2NKbB028806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:23:21 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <42D5CC97.9010605@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:23:19 -0400
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: simple@ietf.org, GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 128.59.29.6
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc:
Subject: [Geopriv] PIDF-LO and the presence data model
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
There doesn't seem to be any real specification indicating how exactly PIDF-LO and the SIMPLE presence data model interact. draft-ietf-geopriv-pidf-lo-03 just gives an example, putting it in <status> within <tuple>. From the perspective of the data model, that's probably the least-liekly place - tuples represent services and seem the least related to one one location, compared to devices (presumably always have exactly one location) and persons (one true location, despite attempts by people to be in two places at the same time). If a user has multiple service (tuples), it seems odd to have one random one indicate a location, or, worse, two conflicting ones. RFC 4079 describes general architecture, not really protocol bits. So far, the Data Model draft doesn't mention PIDF-LO. Did I miss a precise specification anywhere? Maybe the data model should address this; I'm also happy to add this to RPID, but that seems more of a stretch. Henning _______________________________________________ Geopriv mailing list Geopriv@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
- [Geopriv] PIDF-LO and the presence data model Henning Schulzrinne