Re: [Geopriv] IPR on geopriv-arch

todd glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net> Wed, 13 October 2010 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <tglassey@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0423A69C1 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.542
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sbp4Dlsv271f for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D6B3A6876 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=nhGQWr8DeA/sa1rCa2i0VMCyNubV/3FHyiE2a8G7RkI/lkBnjFv/pqZJdMjdLMxi; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [65.50.200.85] (helo=[192.168.1.188]) by elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <tglassey@earthlink.net>) id 1P67FN-0005TF-K0 for geopriv@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:44:21 -0400
Message-ID: <4CB60C19.4060701@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:44:25 -0700
From: todd glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geopriv@ietf.org
References: <52164B48-92BE-4B47-B0EB-57F737A171A0@bbn.com> <F64ACA0B-0461-4BED-9750-A0A7A03F98E2@bbn.com> <201010121744.o9CHiban015753@sj-core-1.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201010121744.o9CHiban015753@sj-core-1.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7979fef9e7e9e5fdaca11dc28413c00617350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 65.50.200.85
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] IPR on geopriv-arch
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:43:05 -0000

On 10/12/2010 10:44 AM, James M. Polk wrote:
> At 11:05 AM 10/12/2010, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>> <hat type="individual"/>
>>
>> I am comfortable with this document moving forward.  I have looked at
>> the Enterasys patents, and it looks to me like they relate to specific
>> applications (location-based access control and routing), so that they
>> don't intrude on a general location architecture.  With regard to the
>> Qualcomm disclosure, their reluctance to provide information makes me
>> a little nervous, but it still seems like this document is abstract
>> enough that it would be useful in spite of IPR claims on some specific
>> realizations.
> 
> It's hard to feel comfortable about the unknown.
> 
> James

Yes but one thing is certain and that is that this same draft also
violates the GEOPRIV IPR notices we already have on file as well so...
there are other issues.

And FWIW - the next Court date in the first litigation of that patent
issue... is tomorrow with the next one being the 9th of November.

Todd Glassey

> 
> 
>> --Richard
>>
>>
>> On Oct 12, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>>
>>> <hat type="chair"/>
>>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> Two IPR disclosures have been filed with regard to draft-ietf-
>>> geopriv-arch, one from Qualcomm and one from Enterasys:
>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1394/>
>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1402/>
>>>
>>> The Qualcomm disclosure relates to an unpublished US patent
>>> application, so no information is available from the USPTO website.
>>> Robert and I have asked Qualcomm for further technical details, but
>>> have not received any.  The Enterasys disclosure relates to three
>>> issued patents.
>>>
>>> The question for the group is whether the WG is comfortable moving
>>> these documents forward given these IPR disclosures.  If you have
>>> thoughts on this question, please send them to the list no later
>>> than Monday, 18 Oct.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --Richard
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3192 - Release Date: 10/11/10 23:34:00
> 


-- 
//-----------------------------------------------------------------


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based
on this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message.

Thank you for your cooperation.