IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] IPR on geopriv-arch

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sat, 16 October 2010 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6A13A6A2C for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.276
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.323, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jktoXUuwHcoF for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C4B943A6A99 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2010 17:05:46 -0000
Received: from a88-115-222-204.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.1.7]) [88.115.222.204] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 16 Oct 2010 19:05:46 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Qoowf0SFQhuj0sbBgSGCoh2yGhLfxqwC5tD3QE0 zQC9LX1SO1LS43
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <52164B48-92BE-4B47-B0EB-57F737A171A0@bbn.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:05:43 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <923C28F4-BFE1-421F-BEA0-F1EC5438068A@gmx.net>
References: <52164B48-92BE-4B47-B0EB-57F737A171A0@bbn.com>
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] IPR on geopriv-arch
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:04:25 -0000

Hey Richard, 

I looked at the available IPRs and based on what I have seen I suggest to go ahead with the publication of the geopriv-arch document. 

Ciao
Hannes

On Oct 12, 2010, at 6:58 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:

> <hat type="chair"/>
> 
> Hey all,
> 
> Two IPR disclosures have been filed with regard to draft-ietf-geopriv-arch, one from Qualcomm and one from Enterasys:
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1394/>
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1402/>
> 
> The Qualcomm disclosure relates to an unpublished US patent application, so no information is available from the USPTO website.  Robert and I have asked Qualcomm for further technical details, but have not received any.  The Enterasys disclosure relates to three issued patents.
> 
> The question for the group is whether the WG is comfortable moving these documents forward given these IPR disclosures.  If you have thoughts on this question, please send them to the list no later than Monday, 18 Oct.
> 
> Thanks,
> --Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email