Re: [GROW] draft-raszuk-diverse-bgp-path-dist-01 working group document

Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> Sat, 27 March 2010 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Original-To: grow@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10E13A68BF for <grow@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.131
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MOgn9MMhFNrc for <grow@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FE23A684F for <grow@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D5839E8100; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8DBp-G5-FicF; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (cpe-76-174-94-219.socal.res.rr.com [76.174.94.219]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F318139E80F9; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <B8AC0EF2-B8C5-4253-92FF-CD0688CA26BD@cs.ucla.edu>
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <A27EA632-1513-4BE5-871C-D091FB53D09A@tcb.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:14:51 -0700
References: <002101cacc62$acbcdc00$06369400$@com> <A27EA632-1513-4BE5-871C-D091FB53D09A@tcb.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-raszuk-diverse-bgp-path-dist-01 working group document
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:14:27 -0000

On Mar 27, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Danny McPherson wrote:

>
> On Mar 25, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Peter Schoenmaker wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> At the Stockholm IETF Robert Raszuk presented the draft on  
>> distribution of
>> diverse BGP paths.  The question was put at the session on whether  
>> to adopt
>> this document as working group document.
>>
>> I would like to get the feedback of the list on if we should adopt  
>> this
>> document.
>
> I support it, perhsps unsurprisingly..
>
> -danny

me too

Lixia