Re: [GROW] draft-raszuk-diverse-bgp-path-dist-01 working group document

<gregory.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com> Mon, 12 April 2010 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: grow@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976273A6A50 for <grow@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 07:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.782
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.782 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.133, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BAA+t6FcmEvu for <grow@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8923A6A3A for <grow@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 15EE5760009; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:34:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA5E778001; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:33:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:33:25 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:33:24 +0200
Message-ID: <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101523B2F@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <002101cacc62$acbcdc00$06369400$@com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [GROW] draft-raszuk-diverse-bgp-path-dist-01 working group document
Thread-Index: AcrMYqkL7PsgoGsDSL+JycsRwf2lpQN6Xmkg
References: <002101cacc62$acbcdc00$06369400$@com>
From: gregory.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com
To: pds@lugs.com, grow@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2010 14:33:25.0073 (UTC) FILETIME=[1C024C10:01CADA4D]
Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-raszuk-diverse-bgp-path-dist-01 working group document
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:34:02 -0000

Hi all,

I support this document as it indeed may be an interesting tool to move our architectures towards multiple BGP paths announcements with add-paths support at the end.

I however find it difficult to comment the document and make it progressing as we still don't have a clear view on a standard and shared "n-best paths calculation" (with n>1) algorithm.

Regards,

--
Greg

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : grow-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:grow-bounces@ietf.org] De 
> la part de Peter Schoenmaker
> Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 22:32
> À : grow@ietf.org
> Objet : [GROW] draft-raszuk-diverse-bgp-path-dist-01 working 
> group document
> 
> Hello,
> 
> At the Stockholm IETF Robert Raszuk presented the draft on 
> distribution of diverse BGP paths.  The question was put at 
> the session on whether to adopt this document as working 
> group document.
> 
> I would like to get the feedback of the list on if we should 
> adopt this document.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Peter -- Chris
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>