Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
Anthony Kirkham <tkirkham@anthony-kirkham.com> Sun, 20 May 2012 10:39 UTC
Return-Path: <tkirkham@anthony-kirkham.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B88B21F8570; Sun, 20 May 2012 03:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBrmHfo5XXZD; Sun, 20 May 2012 03:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF10221F856C; Sun, 20 May 2012 03:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nskntotgx04p.mx.bigpond.com ([123.211.150.122]) by nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20120520103910.DKSV10464.nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx04p.mx.bigpond.com>; Sun, 20 May 2012 10:39:10 +0000
Received: from Anthonys-MacBook-Pro.local ([123.211.150.122]) by nskntotgx04p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20120520103910.JAXH9520.nskntotgx04p.mx.bigpond.com@Anthonys-MacBook-Pro.local>; Sun, 20 May 2012 10:39:10 +0000
Message-ID: <4FB8C99D.4030202@anthony-kirkham.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 20:38:21 +1000
From: Anthony Kirkham <tkirkham@anthony-kirkham.com>
Organization: Anthony-Kirkham.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76BA8836D@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76BA8836D@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at nskntotgx04p.mx.bigpond.com from [123.211.150.122] using ID anthony.kirkham at Sun, 20 May 2012 10:39:10 +0000
X-SIH-MSG-ID: ohg6EtD/TFOplWx72WziQVUtlUy7/yU1v8pWRYIhuRsaT1jBuMDAQs+jbaJDw56FkWBcS0vMLmMgc63kV4zYuNiwMb5RW7Lj
Cc: "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tkirkham@anthony-kirkham.com
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 10:39:14 -0000
If we come back to the original intent of this draft. The private-ip draft was fundamentally intended to provide some useful information on a topic, which had not previously been documented. And in my experience, there was a lot of confusion in relation to the subject across many ISPs. It was certainly not designed to make recommendations as to best practice (even though I have my own views on that). I have worded the document to avoid any suggestion of good or bad practice, just documenting the effects. I would not like to see it delayed by getting caught up in these discussions. It should certainly not prevent any of these other discussions going forward. That's my 0.02c, and again thanks for all the feedback and discussion. Tony K On 18/05/12 2:11 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote: > Folks, > > Thanks for introducing this document! > > I would like to bring the authors' attention to the following documents that are working in OPSEC: > > - draft-behringer-lla-only > - draft-baker-opsec-passive-ip-address > > To some extent, draft-grow and draft-behringer are debating with one another. While draft-baker is not directly involved in the debate, it is not uninvolved, either. It is a shame that the three documents are being considered in different WGs. > > For the purpose of discussing these three documents, I think that a little cross-posting is acceptable. > > -------------------------- > Ron Bonica > vcard: www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf > > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > GROW@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > > --
- [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores Ronald Bonica
- Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores Nick Hilliard
- Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores Anthony Kirkham
- Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores t.petch
- Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores Robert Raszuk
- Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores Ronald Bonica
- Re: [GROW] [OPSEC] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-… Warren Kumari
- Re: [GROW] [OPSEC] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [GROW] [OPSEC] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-… Christopher Morrow