IETF Logo Mail Archive

[GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Thu, 17 May 2012 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B3B21F866D; Thu, 17 May 2012 09:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id coXxzb2qndnH; Thu, 17 May 2012 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og126.obsmtp.com (exprod7og126.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F3B21F865B; Thu, 17 May 2012 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob126.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT7UjQVh98DnwTfNI4+CsbJ0D4NqxJGn7@postini.com; Thu, 17 May 2012 09:11:46 PDT
Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 17 May 2012 09:11:31 -0700
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by p-cldfe02-hq.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 17 May 2012 09:11:31 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:11:30 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:11:29 -0400
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
Thread-Index: Ac00R7enS8J+NXJ5TBeH1QUCwxMMRg==
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76BA8836D@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:11:47 -0000

Folks,

Thanks for introducing this document! 

I would like to bring the authors' attention to the following documents that are working in OPSEC:

- draft-behringer-lla-only
- draft-baker-opsec-passive-ip-address

To some extent, draft-grow and draft-behringer are debating with one another. While draft-baker is not directly involved in the debate, it is not uninvolved, either. It is a shame that the three documents are being considered in different WGs. 

For the purpose of discussing these three documents, I think that a little cross-posting is acceptable.

--------------------------
Ron Bonica
vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email