IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Tue, 22 May 2012 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6564B21F8589; Tue, 22 May 2012 14:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rqYi4JeSCi08; Tue, 22 May 2012 14:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og110.obsmtp.com (exprod7og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4681121F8603; Tue, 22 May 2012 14:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob110.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT7wA0/pdvdhUftJGAMoim5jk+RCK23ld@postini.com; Tue, 22 May 2012 14:10:45 PDT
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 22 May 2012 14:07:21 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Tue, 22 May 2012 17:07:10 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 17:07:08 -0400
Thread-Topic: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
Thread-Index: Ac03/QuUMzo/ZokMR2GmjIr9l5EgQQAYLJlA
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76C03EEBF@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76BA8836D@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <016b01cd37fc$9e125420$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <016b01cd37fc$9e125420$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 21:10:51 -0000

Tom,

AFAIKS, the WGLC that Chris suggested in the email below can proceed:

- http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02263.html

The updates that Chris requested seem to be addressed in the two versions that have been posted since then. Chris, do you agree?

                                               Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: t.petch [mailto:ietfc@btconnect.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 5:24 AM
> To: Ronald Bonica; grow@ietf.org; opsec@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ronald Bonica" <rbonica@juniper.net>
> To: <grow@ietf.org>; <opsec@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:11 PM
> > Folks,
> >
> > Thanks for introducing this document!
> >
> > I would like to bring the authors' attention to the following
> documents that are working in OPSEC:
> >
> > - draft-behringer-lla-only
> > - draft-baker-opsec-passive-ip-address
> >
> > To some extent, draft-grow and draft-behringer are debating with one
> another. While draft-baker is not directly involved in the debate, it
> is not uninvolved, either. It is a shame that the three documents are
> being considered in different WGs.
> 
> I think it a bigger shame that draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores is
> not in the RFC Editor queue awaiting publication!
> 
> It is a natural companion to RFC6598 and could have, should have, been
> in the queue at the same time.  This I-D was relevant when it was first
> written 2 years ago, and I see its relevance decreasing with time, as
> people stumble over the mistakes that this I-D could have prevented.
> It has taken those 2 years to get this I-D IETF-ready, little has
> changed in the content in that time, and it is time we got it out of
> the door.
> 
> Of course there is scope for improvement, there always is, but that is
> an argument for never publishing anything.  If the authors of the other
> I-Ds want to build on it, then of course they can produce a bis that
> covers more, but let's publish what we have got.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> >
> > For the purpose of discussing these three documents, I think that a
> little cross-posting is acceptable.
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Ron Bonica
> > vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GROW mailing list
> > GROW@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email