Re: [GROW] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05: (with DISCUSS)

[joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

I'm under no illusion that terry's dicussion will have changed by the
time he's installed.

I would rather have it done sooner in any event.

we did not get a change out prior ti the jan discussion and it stalled
after that sorry.

On 2/9/15 1:06 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Any progress on this?
> 
> Just in case you were holding out the hope that my Discuss will expire when I leave the IESG, I have to point out that my Discuss was to make sure that the RTG Dir review by Terry Manderson gets attention. And Terry will show up on the IESG when I leave :-)
> 
> Shame to see a document sitting when it is so close to being done.
> 
> Adrian
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: iesg [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>> Sent: 18 December 2014 15:33
>> To: The IESG
>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>> [e-mail]
>> Subject: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-
>> considerations-05: (with DISCUSS)
>>
>> Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05: Discuss
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I'd like to see some discussion of the points raised by Terry Manderson
>> in his Routing Directorate review during the IETF last call period
>> (circulated on the Grow list at
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03015.html).
>>
>> By preference this discussion should be between the authors, WG, and
>> reviewer. But I'd be happy to step in and own the discussions if that
>> will help.
>>
>>
> 
> 
>