Re: [GROW] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05: (with DISCUSS)

["McPherson, Danny" <[e-mail]>]

These are some pretty significant changes that themselves could be an
internet-draft/document, methinks.  Perhaps those so interested in C.I.A
in their comments could contribute some text, this was meant to be more
operational.

I hope Eric has the cycles to resolve these [non-trivial comments] and if
they did get resolved it¹d surely need to return to WG LC (IMO) ‹ and I¹d
presuppose someone would find an opportunity to request a review from
SIDR, although part of the intent was expressly to avoid beating that
horse.

I¹ll defer to Eric if he¹s going to be able to address these, but I can
pretty much guarantee it won¹t see the RFC editor until well after Dallas
(if ever, now).

Alas, 


-danny


On 3/2/15, 1:51 AM, "joel jaeggli" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>hello,
>
>would like to chase this one down and resolve it.
>
>http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03015.html
>
>but haven't seen to much activity.
>
>lets do this thing and maybe we can publish this one before the upcoming
>meeting.
>
>joel
>
>On 2/9/15 9:08 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
>> I'm under no illusion that terry's dicussion will have changed by the
>> time he's installed.
>> 
>> I would rather have it done sooner in any event.
>> 
>> we did not get a change out prior ti the jan discussion and it stalled
>> after that sorry.
>> 
>> On 2/9/15 1:06 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any progress on this?
>>>
>>> Just in case you were holding out the hope that my Discuss will expire
>>>when I leave the IESG, I have to point out that my Discuss was to make
>>>sure that the RTG Dir review by Terry Manderson gets attention. And
>>>Terry will show up on the IESG when I leave :-)
>>>
>>> Shame to see a document sitting when it is so close to being done.
>>>
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: iesg [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>>>> Sent: 18 December 2014 15:33
>>>> To: The IESG
>>>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>>>>[e-mail];
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> Subject: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on
>>>>draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-
>>>> considerations-05: (with DISCUSS)
>>>>
>>>> Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for
>>>> draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05: Discuss
>>>>
>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
>>>>this
>>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please refer to
>>>>http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>>> 
>>>>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-cons
>>>>iderations/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> DISCUSS:
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to see some discussion of the points raised by Terry
>>>>Manderson
>>>> in his Routing Directorate review during the IETF last call period
>>>> (circulated on the Grow list at
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03015.html).
>>>>
>>>> By preference this discussion should be between the authors, WG, and
>>>> reviewer. But I'd be happy to step in and own the discussions if that
>>>> will help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> 
>
>