Re: [GROW] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up (start 22/Jan/2024 end 6/Feb/2024)

[Job Snijders <[e-mail]>]

Dear all,

The WGLC has concluded. A few people spoke out in favor of publication,
no objections were raised. I'll work on the shepherd write-up.

Thanks!

Kind regards,

Job

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> As requested during the IETF 118 GROW session in Prague, Czechia, a
> "Working Group Last Call" is now issued for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up.
> This phase will last about 2 weeks. We'd love to hear from you,
> especially from BMP implementers!
> 
> Please review the document, consider whether it should advance in the
> publication pipeline, and provide feedback! ... before February 6th,
> please :-) 
> 
> The abstract for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up:
> 
>     """
>     RFC 7854, BMP, uses different message types for different purposes.
>     Most of these are Type, Length, Value (TLV) structured. One message
>     type, the Peer Up message, lacks a set of TLVs defined for its use,
>     instead sharing a namespace with the Initiation message. Subsequent
>     experience has shown that this namespace sharing was a mistake, as
>     it hampers the extension of the protocol.
>     
>     This document updates RFC 7854 by creating an independent namespace
>     for the Peer Up message. It also updates RFC 8671 and RFC 9069 by
>     moving the defined codepoints in the newly introduced registry. The
>     changes in this document are formal only, compliant implementations
>     of RFC 7854, RFC 8671 and RFC 9069 also comply with this
>     specification.
>     """
> 
> The internet-draft itself and associated information are available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up/
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job
> GROW co-chair