IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-06

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 24 June 2015 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01E91A1BD4; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mmtSV5SZ9-7K; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D29861A88A9; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Z7uCe-00064x-IL; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:35:36 +0000
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:35:35 +0900
Message-ID: <m2pp4k7k8o.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <558B3AEE.2010009@nostrum.com>
References: <558B3AEE.2010009@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/q6Yff7o49rhmMc0jtFkTxAnr0lA>
Cc: GROW List <grow@ietf.org>, IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-06
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:35:40 -0000

> Is the last paragraph of 4.1 an IETF consensus position on how operators 
> might charge one another? It would be good to find a way to word this 
> that look more like statements of fact and less like charging advice.

darn hard as there are no facts there and it is first class lawyer bait.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email