IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hiprg] New ID: draft-wang-hiprg-service-overlay-00

"Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> Tue, 02 March 2010 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB2D28C11F for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:39:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D0zLwudmw7CZ for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com (slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.64.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720053A8B99 for <hiprg@irtf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (stl-av-01.boeing.com [192.76.190.6]) by slb-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.14.4/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id o22GcwpV018915 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:38:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id o22Gcw92029728; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:38:58 -0600 (CST)
Received: from XCH-NWHT-10.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-10.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.113]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id o22Gcv5F029702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:38:58 -0600 (CST)
Received: from XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.83]) by XCH-NWHT-10.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.113]) with mapi; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:38:57 -0800
From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
To: "'shen.jiong@zte.com.cn'" <shen.jiong@zte.com.cn>, "hiprg@irtf.org" <hiprg@irtf.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:38:57 -0800
Thread-Topic: [hiprg] New ID: draft-wang-hiprg-service-overlay-00
Thread-Index: Acq5r/xDR+u+VrsOT96mNXqq5Inq8gAddXdw
Message-ID: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4C1F48A837@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <20100301095535.BA6F53A867E@core3.amsl.com> <OF5B3543C1.C1671D5C-ON482576DA.000713E8-482576DA.000DBFA3@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <OF5B3543C1.C1671D5C-ON482576DA.000713E8-482576DA.000DBFA3@zte.com.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4C1F48A837XCHNW10Vnwnos_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "wang.jun17@zte.com.cn" <wang.jun17@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [hiprg] New ID: draft-wang-hiprg-service-overlay-00
X-BeenThere: hiprg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Host Identity Protocol \(HIP\) Research Group" <hiprg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/hiprg>
List-Post: <mailto:hiprg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:39:04 -0000

________________________________
From: hiprg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:hiprg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of shen.jiong@zte.com.cn
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 6:28 PM
To: hiprg@irtf.org
Cc: wang.jun17@zte.com.cn
Subject: [hiprg] New ID: draft-wang-hiprg-service-overlay-00


Dear all,

A new Internet Draft entitled "HIP Service Overlay Study" has been submitted.  It can be accessed at:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-hiprg-service-overlay-00.txt

(filename: draft-wang-hiprg-service-overlay-00)
It is a HIP service overlay study document, it presents several disadvantages of current HIP protocol and then takes a brief introduction of two existing alternative solutions. Finally, we propose a HIP service overlay architecture.
Your comments on the proposed mechanism would be highly appreciated. In addition, I would be glad to make a small presentation and discuss it in the upcoming IETF 77 meeting.

I added you to the draft agenda:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/HIPRG.txt

Regards,
Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email