Re: [Hipsec] transition from CLOSING state to state I1-SENT
Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi> Wed, 30 July 2014 09:40 UTC
Return-Path: <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC4B1B2A69 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YquUVRrdEE7z for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349671A0176 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.10]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E32130874C for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:40:18 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <53D8BD77.8010004@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:40:07 +0300
From: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org
References: <53D6CB3B.6000503@tomh.org>
In-Reply-To: <53D6CB3B.6000503@tomh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/UW6f_9f1nhCVFFMMoJektV3t2Uw
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] transition from CLOSING state to state I1-SENT
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:40:20 -0000
Hi, On 07/29/2014 01:14 AM, Tom Henderson wrote: > This issue with RFC5201-bis is being tracked as issue 48: > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/48 > > When a HIP association is in state CLOSING and new data arrives to send > to the peer, Table 7 states to send another I1 but stay in CLOSING, > while our state machine diagram implies that there is a transition to > state I1-SENT. > > I propose to fix this by changing the Table 7 to read that the state > machine transitions to state I1-SENT in this case. > > Any comments or objections? seems ok to me.
- [Hipsec] transition from CLOSING state to state I… Tom Henderson
- Re: [Hipsec] transition from CLOSING state to sta… Miika Komu