Re: [Hipsec] Status of our next batch

Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi> Wed, 18 November 2015 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EDA1B2D8B for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 05:42:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.785
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dzNS11gFxo7u for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 05:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876BC1B2D8A for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 05:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mannerheim.cs.hut.fi [130.233.193.8]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2C1177C5 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:42:40 +0200 (EET)
To: hipsec@ietf.org
References: <564C2E26.5030609@ericsson.com>
From: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
Message-ID: <564C8050.3080708@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:42:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <564C2E26.5030609@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/iuVmy0wItTC9BCE_MTaanRSIMXY>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of our next batch
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 13:42:44 -0000

Hi,

On 11/18/2015 09:52 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Authors of the following drafts,
>
> could you please let the WG know their status and what needs to happen
> next for each of them in order to be able to WGLC them at some point in
> the future?
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/

rfc4423-bis-12 does not have any outstanding issues. It should be the 
last one in the batch since it references the other drafts.