Re: [homenet] DNCP/HNCP Revisited

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 20 September 2019 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462AE120059 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64ICEVPyWex5 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DC6A120052 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id 3so4141309qta.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=D2nQ2Y+fcmTSEfK6SuKLwsv3jYr9XjuQ0v3nO7/Omcw=; b=1hmf4TZTys9C2GhPDdhVHN4sggw1F0PlWmdd31U/g/UeynbK/2KoAXQ6Av70bqUTzT nKgNrOVrMOUqAc7kF7ojWXb2N0i1n6e6B4gftu/OmoVibuRyY3Xq67SopfidxV+Vmyyd 22m1KRxW/k470RJH6a6QRn2TIb18gCd34MjTj+wXfIiN8gZGaM5rhfWg4IfOHS4J0m5W /6jizfkC1J4kIIRYp62zPFVniIhmJo08UCwHbnrfRYHMvUOWGINXNUtxJYs0Bd0AFCVY +vWQlemwLjcfmvAtHQoecT+s9hnLcZ+ikQomXLx2sCUeLeABANLMJgmvxJqVfR474s48 om1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=D2nQ2Y+fcmTSEfK6SuKLwsv3jYr9XjuQ0v3nO7/Omcw=; b=akVL21AWn1/N47HvZDKtxu/qPLkFDE9C/PiqQDabf3noRLDV3tiJhyFxs6bBLsgI5F gfFdQcVKiYmOqS3eIQ7WNt2TXaHNmrMVOygEW/EtGsnnb+H2JCzVdft4wF4fLbTpy5QS n3JHEnx9fZIx9ERdj7rYlPEtmUFwN3BJ8ZwtneCTlQWFLKyh5crIlHHErbG0MAPudRmw pfnIe5qfEPvD1JrEr6OTsQgYTsbXBsMaNKjYI+L2cADqrUtMyrsezyS3NjNlBVvlWDPl xTl8gDDj5i1pOuPlU39rvNDfxuOsKzSUq2nrCPYeuCY0HMmnXOc+78JVzV2xL04i5hdo oiOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX255NbSc0u4UdEaoEjljBXd7J6fjA5Oj/dAD1+GHRwRCyK6OQX PahTnrpVnD/98cNQHmlNyl8VHe1oGyX07Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxkJX12FyxKfbLGSSsICo+eP4Fkonn4ruPlugAEGTLMD8WP1P+IXpp1NGR3C3satoAYXWtCrg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:458e:: with SMTP id l14mr6272193qtn.153.1568937984303; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.16] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x55sm108248qta.74.2019.09.19.17.06.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <E3C2871E-8192-4A62-8563-CC054C9AC30D@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_71A9194D-A4B6-45E5-81B0-616E4D04335E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:06:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87sgorvo8i.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Cc: RayH <v6ops@globis.net>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
References: <8BC1E900-3E7D-44F0-A01D-94D468627BFF@fugue.com> <ca63f70f-56b4-438b-99ae-46b09c89596d@email.android.com> <87sgorvo8i.wl-jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/3uZwT7-6ZQuqkRE-5ZPpiuz5Qh4>
Subject: Re: [homenet] DNCP/HNCP Revisited
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:06:27 -0000

On Sep 19, 2019, at 7:51 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
> Because HNCP allows aggregating multiple TLVs in a single packet, to the
> implementation's discretion.  Section 4.2 of RFC 7787.

Thanks, Juliusz.  This and your previous message were quite helpful.

I think there does need to be some hacking done on HNCP, but I agree with you that it’s a heavy lift.