IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] [Anima] Homenet feedback on the ANIMA charter

Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net> Tue, 07 October 2014 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@townsley.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633991A9148 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 02:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8z8tWw53tGfJ for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 02:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094871A8FD4 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 02:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x13so8714190wgg.30 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=vRRnPRue6cT5fWGB3TsLxoa+C/XyYefXSDq8eBu9sFY=; b=lYOtjCU6i/1O4NWcZcU2EKtmF7W3o3JiUTijXY01YsdCBNWJ2Iypz1AKzjX1+q2zKA sV/WsTycvFnPWcLA8oFjCwvy7FeYiKiqOj0nbTmkTCQ5mDK4r8vAf8WbW6/Zpqec9Ost AuZ2RoqMJfqKuvsumPwH6Y1v4VbAkdeXR2EI+ZBV96b3ejIrQ3Oj+1JVYSn6Tz783ycp TQtuoUP7ikLWmGr4Z/iFVIE9Owltbz8WaWqLqGi3nYt39FJYfWHtpSfyN1T6UZY56h1K wEuHx2V4dvIfUdvWL431T0S/KsvRQu7GJhW3P3AUOfwJjsigbJ11rOvcxMEr4SPxMyKy KwVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnz1LcdxxTUeEyc0PjpMqV5DZXNTXAkTkvxus5Z+pBZTqOGjFaQxYpUvPxKDQ6LJkgeViOc
X-Received: by 10.194.78.238 with SMTP id e14mr2961419wjx.48.1412672453453; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.55.189.249] (173-38-208-170.cisco.com. [173.38.208.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id he2sm1984949wib.4.2014.10.07.02.00.51 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-DDE14193-A7A2-4234-8924-AFA160246918"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12A405)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr2aK8zzhJXTbbOf=kshQa8gpK4jeCCCn5Enzg-A6L3ZCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:00:50 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <626B3345-F1B9-4EF0-8957-8EBAA81540B1@townsley.net>
References: <542BFFAE.1080105@cisco.com> <CD1269E0-96B5-4A1A-8C1C-93DAB44068D4@iki.fi> <542C59B3.10700@gmail.com> <5F26857C-1C41-4D1F-AA4A-B7D9E947180F@townsley.net> <542CC380.1030600@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2aK8zzhJXTbbOf=kshQa8gpK4jeCCCn5Enzg-A6L3ZCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/AHpbU4LJVruZ3IOUx6yVZJsE52I
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] [Anima] Homenet feedback on the ANIMA charter
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:00:57 -0000

The charter as written now aims to develop building blocks which can be applied commonly across a wide range of networks including enterprise, SP, (home?), and IOT, yet the very first use-case listed in order to provide WG focus is restricted to carrier-only? (and, to Lorenzo's point, what does that actually mean with respect to IP address assignment?)

If a carrier-only use-case is doing its job of focusing the WG, it will naturally lead to carrier-centric building blocks, contradictory to the stated goal of the group.

- Mark

> On Oct 2, 2014, at 8:26 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This use case is precisely what draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment does (which has roots all the way back to draft-arkko-homenet-prefix-assignment-00 in October 2011). So to homenet, this is a solved problem - with an algorithm that has been applied not just to HNCP, but to OSPF and ISIS.
>> 
>> Well, we have a bug in our short description, because the intention is to
>> support prefix assignment in a carrier scenario, which is different
>> in many ways. 
> 
> Really? Which ways?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email