Re: [homenet] [Anima] Homenet feedback on the ANIMA charter

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 02 October 2014 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8914F1A1AAC; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 11:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4W8Tpi0AqqQr; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 11:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D15F1A1AA9; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 11:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id eu11so3176691pac.35 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JzFcfiqKav1RlXnvt0N1sGdelejPoxTbqtEYodCDi0Y=; b=AHzPTqFmuFXhLVAQR68iUebPscFv82Ez4a0L5ge6tBlQn0KSyju6H54YG0qQmPaPNo n9NZHKPT4igxvJ3D8a5srYd5QGaLqvckj/pFFga7SHAqzhDTdgK8H6lVNajRC8W19wFR ozuov0IK7r/IPnul2w9YJI9UbMw1gLIUnv3A0XkUMVrIHpk+63R9h45iUYKV7bDXX4Kb Ml3Ts7uEFEiU9Bs0mF6gZFGtdYTd5JO9l4TEysWDpSh3HtqvvS4X6FrXh0hu4Js6TsQB 8CN78DATqsGYKZfGBbhGQdQTXo2vmHuaRFvazdK0tJOLN3r/wR3HGXSqGzcEOr4EJsrx wkyQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.69.36 with SMTP id b4mr911477pbu.59.1412276309288; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (81.199.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.199.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yh3sm4480949pbb.38.2014.10.02.11.58.25 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <542DA05A.50008@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:58:34 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
References: <542BFFAE.1080105@cisco.com> <CD1269E0-96B5-4A1A-8C1C-93DAB44068D4@iki.fi> <542C59B3.10700@gmail.com> <5F26857C-1C41-4D1F-AA4A-B7D9E947180F@townsley.net> <542CC380.1030600@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2aK8zzhJXTbbOf=kshQa8gpK4jeCCCn5Enzg-A6L3ZCA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr2aK8zzhJXTbbOf=kshQa8gpK4jeCCCn5Enzg-A6L3ZCA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/EFP6z558vbQnSDY2RH-ZiaySNMY
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>, Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] [Anima] Homenet feedback on the ANIMA charter
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:58:32 -0000

On 02/10/2014 19:26, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> This use case is precisely what draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment
>> does (which has roots all the way back to
>> draft-arkko-homenet-prefix-assignment-00 in October 2011). So to homenet,
>> this is a solved problem - with an algorithm that has been applied not just
>> to HNCP, but to OSPF and ISIS.
>>
>> Well, we have a bug in our short description, because the intention is to
>> support prefix assignment in a carrier scenario, which is different
>> in many ways.
> 
> 
> Really? Which ways?

That was the point of draft-jiang-auto-addr-management which was
briefly presented at the UCAN BOF.

    Brian