IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Configuration must not be carried by the routing protocol

Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com> Wed, 26 June 2013 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF8911E81C0 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITyUO6GWpcvg for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF3121E811E for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c10so8278754qcz.14 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5sOd8pWGzllmKRxaFy/bDxcP/R64Nf5XyBTgEuuKQPk=; b=gv3TRaYVqpSKyJeZ7jeCOvOKvi9o5hmUGibiFtOWIKpJ8BZARAadXzpE+3oz/UPZnz w06ZnRxihXTfIC8+xcd4MiucrTSeWCm2KKJKgg3qijHXum8Fwsuq9U25GwzrQLEqUdVI /Hc+k1R7ei1EqJrQrwKj5ghOQk78/W7tFBeugUYWEB/p5xC7yz3CXedQqNV1cmsC7yEF 3xP9xMnpmmrEmJX5W2AGT9tQTc/ID4j7MqYSNbsVSXbUP+67cjnJ1eimOzmNILuHx3Q3 DCPnnA/JKQ0rbDu4MotvFQU/qZR5Evc2Gw9/8qAN3piRU5IUCIy5ub+jvE7dxhaBI7L5 QQcw==
X-Received: by 10.49.41.41 with SMTP id c9mr5024426qel.19.1372257786585; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.174.82 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <31A37EFD-C5E5-4D6E-81C2-301EC64CD58B@fugue.com>
References: <878v1yqhje.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <020301ce71e1$da38d120$8eaa7360$@comcast.net> <87wqphonkv.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <1A4D24AC-445C-422A-B2C8-D9C307347BA0@townsley.net> <31A37EFD-C5E5-4D6E-81C2-301EC64CD58B@fugue.com>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:42:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuobZ_m5zstg=eu=Lf4ch2HtOU2m0xdwi=oiuiqU=CK5GQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Configuration must not be carried by the routing protocol
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:43:15 -0000

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net> wrote:
> DHCPv6 PD is explicitly for configuring routers, so I think this assertion is wrong.   I think Lorenzo's argument is a better one.

The routing protocol should be able to draw most (maybe all?) settings
from watching the interface addresses of the local router and maybe a
special local routing table. This should allow to minimize
synchronization problems.

Henning Rogge

--
We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered
long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to
set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email