Re: [homenet] Configuration must not be carried by the routing protocol

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 26 June 2013 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900D621E80E3 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Pa6zx1ljzsw for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D43521F9C0F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (c-174-62-147-182.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [174.62.147.182]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E00A72381D5F; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:52:33 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <1A4D24AC-445C-422A-B2C8-D9C307347BA0@townsley.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:52:32 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <31A37EFD-C5E5-4D6E-81C2-301EC64CD58B@fugue.com>
References: <878v1yqhje.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <020301ce71e1$da38d120$8eaa7360$@comcast.net> <87wqphonkv.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <1A4D24AC-445C-422A-B2C8-D9C307347BA0@townsley.net>
To: Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Configuration must not be carried by the routing protocol
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:53:41 -0000

On Jun 26, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net> wrote:
> That explicit statement went away in RFC 3315, though the terminology section makes it very clear that a Host is not a Router.

DHCPv6 PD is explicitly for configuring routers, so I think this assertion is wrong.   I think Lorenzo's argument is a better one.