Re: [homenet] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CA91B3055 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:06:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOj4JewdeQxk for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:06:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fugue.com (mail-2.fugue.com [IPv6:2a01:7e01::f03c:91ff:fee4:ad68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53991B304D for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----sinikael-?=_1-14478843950960.014707250753417611"
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
To: homenet@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <87vb8zp903.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <20151117235034.24927.22561.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <87poz7qw2k.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <1447858576159-79d51c78-b96c8c38-55ec1307@fugue.com> <8737w3qozs.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <1447863094928-7e8a26f0-271186df-921ed76e@fugue.com> <87vb8zp903.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:06:35 +0000
Message-Id: <1447884395403-59f7ba69-4ce68f01-0794a090@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/JtXGpfNfjlsK1esziCUg4uPviZg>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:06:41 -0000

Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 11:28 AM Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> If someone's argument for why not to adopt HNCP is "it's too hard," then
>> they are discounting the technical debt that they accumulate when they do
>> a one-off ad hoc protocol.
> 
> That's very well put, and exactly what I'm trying to explain to the
> community.  Please help me do that rather than adding to the perception
> that HNCP contains dozens of random, arbitrary requirements.

That's what I thought I was doing by writing that message!   I am not sure it's helpful for me to pop up on the olsr mailing list and start talking about this, and I also don't really have time, but I will see what I can do.

>> There is a reason why the IETF seems slow.
> 
> You're changing the subject, Ted.  Nobody mentioned timeliness.

That's how I read what you said.   I don't think it matters--whether it's timeliness or complexity, there are definitely costs to writing standards for everybody to follow.

> I'm arguing against making strong requirements that will be ignored by any
> sensible implementer.  "Hey, you don't need to deploy that, but you still
> MUST carry the dead code in your implementation".

Right, but I am disputing your claim that they don't need to deploy that.   Deploying it may be a regrettably manual process at the moment, but I think it is very much needed.
 
> How much more silly can one get?

I suspect that collectively we can get very silly indeed, should we choose to seriously put this question to the test, but perhaps that's more of a thing for a bar bof than a working group... ;)


--
Sent from Whiteout Mail - https://whiteout.io

My PGP key: https://keys.whiteout.io/mellon@fugue.com