Re: [homenet] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS)

Brian E Carpenter <> Wed, 18 November 2015 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517631A8AC3; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:23:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jweimCrTGRii; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8021A8AD4; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igl9 with SMTP id 9so106657405igl.0; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:23:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4s17UsQkq/jrZkeaadotIG/6RswhswS9lQL5T8q0WnQ=; b=D2jggdFG+CKbcN2NYEIKaiHqoYfITnPt9EmCaLKh64F7zp40YUw06TjQpE+wGJaepD ZP4r368PLXC5YRnCcgxnyWjXnB0KAEB8JbzlAT4pkAiuFIr5/VxYpG/WvsTyK8IADIHG VTgqsNV89iGyCOX/QiYuCuZ/G4GfGx6R91gh3W2NCQq2z0p/GIbkboXu9NTqIoL7ckq+ s58WMRFUN/gWWpMqlwT1njiasO0LDbcWU4GZTdIB+sXF1OGqpxWieHGHnFnv+iZ4p7E3 +H1Ws6OwvOcilKlYuQXVFcTeL6JDk6Yq3VlRmOXq7nXRp0hDQ0qRy1wbIdH6p4lekAGM ek/Q==
X-Received: by with SMTP id mu7mr6284116igb.2.1447867387478; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:23:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ([]) by with ESMTPSA id 126sm1591006ion.32.2015. (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:23:05 -0800 (PST)
To: Ted Lemon <>,
References: <> <> <> <> <>
From: Brian E Carpenter <>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:23:10 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:23:09 -0000


> The bottom line is that I think the reason you have given for not making DTLS MTI is a really bad one.   There is a perfectly good DTLS implementation out there, which is quite easy to use as far as I can tell,

So I am puzzled. If that is the case, it is not the HNCP implementer who has to
write any DTLS code (in my book, the word "implement" in a protocol spec means
"write code"). At most there would need to be a few extra instructions to wrap
a socket in DTLS, and that code would likely be ifdeffed because it would
only be used when needed. Which sounds exactly like a SHOULD to me.
Or maybe "mandatory to be able to switch on." In any case, not part of the
HNCP protocol itself.