IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] WG adoption of draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 27 March 2014 06:04 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD64C1A0464 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.861
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.861 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YGgQU5s0X-q3 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BED1A0462 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7D78AA5; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:04:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75281A3; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:04:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:04:15 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
In-Reply-To: <53333F51.5030106@globis.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403270703170.747@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <4943103B-77FB-4F95-A519-4FDE1246A128@nominet.org.uk> <53333F51.5030106@globis.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/WVLE9N2BvqfkDDqtYgn_30wwtmg
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] WG adoption of draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 06:04:20 -0000

On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Ray Hunter wrote:

> Support adoption of HNCP as a WG item.
>
> I am interested to read more information on how Homenet would/could work with 
> zero routing protocol.
>
> I presumed exactly one common Homenet interworking routing protocol.

HNCP as it stands right now has a "routing protocol" of it's own that is 
extremely rudimentary, but it gets the job done. I think this is what is 
referred to as "zero routing protcol" because people don't really want to 
call it a routing protocol (my interpretation).

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email