IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] WG adoption of draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00

"Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com> Tue, 01 April 2014 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <shwethab@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36861A6FCC for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OR9J4PKOqstY for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12701A6FC0 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=959; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1396319503; x=1397529103; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zVQ8C629NBjuwED5Gly6sf/JhgVkpD9idROsAjpxxjo=; b=aUVbyVtR5hjFYpxQbtVtUkzj9TnSyfHwMF3VoVKKiUd2i0H83D/pyXGf eDAtyKmF2Lg4nQ8D5C5aNkNzIz2dz/EEvgFFVcPPcNAEdfjhR7TNrLHRT s7nBzrRYAQgn5NywGE3hzP+3EyqrKLAjFD+DevGpsDyZgbMUzZDhIH1ed I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiAFALcjOlOtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABZgwY7V7tohmRRgR4WdIInAQQBAQEaHTQdAQg2NwslAgQBEod5DdEoEwSOHFuEOASYTpI2gzCCKw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,769,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="31861480"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2014 02:31:42 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s312Vgv5009714 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 02:31:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.5]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:31:41 -0500
From: "Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com>
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>, "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [homenet] WG adoption of draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00
Thread-Index: AQHPSBH2sAibSti7AUO5/uF/+E9TuZr81agA
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:31:40 +0000
Message-ID: <CF6022C4.16B941%shwethab@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4943103B-77FB-4F95-A519-4FDE1246A128@nominet.org.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206
x-originating-ip: [10.65.38.145]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B7F5229393D9524AA5E15F043E218403@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/zgkAwbnmP5L4Ga4vp8ScAd5GuDg
Subject: Re: [homenet] WG adoption of draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:31:49 -0000

I have read and support adoption of this draft.

Thanks,
Shwetha

On 3/25/14 3:37 PM, "Ray Bellis" <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> wrote:

>At IETF 89 in London we took three hums:
>
>1. On use of OSPF vs HNCP for configuration - strong consensus for HNCP
>
>2. On how many routing protocols we should support in Homenet -
>  strong consensus that it should be zero or one, but no consensus yet
>  on which.
>
>3. On adoption of HNCP as a WG item - good consensus for, a few undecided,
>  none against.
>
>On this basis the Chairs wish to proceed with the formal call for
>adoption of draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00, with a two week response
>window.
>
>Please therefore send your comments on adoption of this draft to the list
>before 23:59 UTC on Tuesday 1st April.
>
>thanks,
>
>Ray and Mark
>_______________________________________________
>homenet mailing list
>homenet@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email